metoo, sexual, abuse,

Sexual abuse with Jehovah's Witnesses


In the summer of 2017 appeared in newspaper Trouw a series of articles on sexual abuse among Jehovah's Witnesses in the Netherlands. Marinde van der Breggen and Rianne Oosterom, journalists from Trouw, conducted two years of research and interviewed victims and bystanders. Their articles show a poignant reality in which victims are not heard and protected and perpetrators can go free.

Earlier in Australia the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse engaged in investigating how various organizations, whether religious or not, deal with situations of sexual abuse. The organization of Jehovah's Witnesses was also examined. In the data of the Watchtower organization there 1006 perpetrators of sexual abuse were known. None of these perpetrators had been reported to the authorities by the organization. In 2015 there were public hearings with the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses in Australia that could be followed by everyone and at the end of 2017 the final report appeared. Conclusion: the policy of the organization surrounding sexual abuse shows major shortcomings.


When the elders in a congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses face an allegation of sexual abuse within their congregation, they must contact their branch's legal department. He then gives instructions on how to proceed further.

The elders must investigate whether the accusation is true. In doing so, it is checked, among other things, whether the person making the accusation can be found reliable and credible. The victim is asked about the most intimate details of the abuse. Until 1998, the victim was asked to confront the perpetrator with the accusation in the presence of elders. In any case, the current policy no longer requires this from minors. Unfortunately, there is no black-and-white that in the meantime adult victims have also been protected from this confrontation.

To proceed with further action, the elders need two witnesses. If the perpetrator denies and there is no second witness, the perpetrator is considered innocent and the victim is told to leave the matter "in Jehovah's hands." The victim and family are asked to remain silent about the matter because otherwise it can be interpreted as slander. No further steps are taken and the perpetrator remains in the municipality. Even if the perpetrator confesses and repents, he will remain part of the congregation and at most will be restricted.

If there is sufficient evidence and the perpetrator shows no repentance, he is excluded. Both in the case of restrictions and exclusion, only that fact is reported in the presence of the municipality, it is not explained why. In the first case, other children within the municipality and outside are at risk of becoming a victim, in the second case still in society outside the organization.

The use of sexual abuse can not be declared to the authorities

Jehovah's Witnesses are a closed community. They see themselves as the only true religion and do everything to keep the image of a clean organization where, according to high moral standards, the world is maintained. Negative information about the organization is seen as attacks by "the devil" or "defamation on Jehovah's name."

Within the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses, sexual abuse is initially seen as a sin. That is why church members are expected to report sexual abuse to the elders.

The organization does not see it as its task to report a perpetrator of sexual abuse to the authorities. Following the investigation by the Royal Commission in Australia (and subsequent recommendations), the organization has made a minor change, so that elders now have to inform the victim and his parents that they have the right to report the case to world authorities. However, they place the responsibility for reporting to the victim and / or the parents. The tone in which these are informed by the elders, in combination with the beliefs, can be of essential importance to their final decision.

The two-witness rule

The organization focuses entirely on the Bible in its policy. She believes that the guidelines they find in it are applicable at all times. The two-statement rule is based on the text in Deuteronomy 19: 15 and Mattheus 18: 16. This means that only when there are two or three witnesses to an offense, the act can be seen as proven and the accused can be punished. Because there are rarely witnesses to sexual abuse, it is usually the victim's word against that of the perpetrator. The two-witness rule therefore works in favor of the latter.

Within the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses, only the Governing Body has the authority to explain Bible texts and change policies. Hopefully they will see that the two-witness rule is not applicable in case of sexual abuse and to change their policy.

To conceal

When a perpetrator of sexual abuse is excluded, only the report is made in the presence of the municipality: '(name) is no longer one of Jehovah's Witnesses'. There is no mention of the reason. Even when a repentant perpetrator is only restricted, the sexual abuse is not mentioned. If, in the absence of a second witness and denial, there is no proof, the victim is asked to keep silent about the abuse, because otherwise this can be interpreted as 'slander'. In some cases, family heads - usually the fathers - of families with children are informed. But the municipality as such is not informed when there is an (alleged) perpetrator of sexual abuse among them. This culture of silence and secrecy seems largely aimed at protecting the image of the organization.

Lack of women in the process

For a victim of sexual abuse, it can be much more difficult to reveal details of the abuse to men than to a woman. However, because women are not allowed to hold positions of authority within the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses, they are not involved in sexual abuse procedures. This means that within the procedure outlined above, a victim of sexual abuse always has to deal with men.

During the investigation of the Royal Commission in Australia, some high-ranking executives of the organization indicated that women could be involved in the trial of an allegation of sexual abuse. The final decision, however, also concerning the reliability of the accusation, is always taken by the (male) elders.

There is also no guideline or provision for a female supporting person. The current guideline as indicated in the letter to the elders of 1 September 2017 (par.11), shows that in case of a minor victim, in addition to the elders, another person, preferably a parent, should be present at the providing pastoral care to the victim. If the parent himself is the perpetrator, it may also be another church member in whom the victim has confidence. However, it is not explicitly stated that this can be a woman and it is not mentioned that this supportive person may be present at questions concerning the accusation of sexual abuse. For now victims of age, no guidelines have been included regarding a supporting person.

There is a big chance that a victim who has to tell her story in front of men does not feel at ease here. This procedure can even aggravate the trauma.


The current policy of the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses is seriously inadequate with regard to sexual abuse. Everything seems to be aimed at protecting the organization and acting according to the rules, while too few precautionary measures are taken to protect children or prevent further trauma.

Good policies regarding situations of sexual abuse should be the focus of the child or victim. Children should be protected against possible perpetrators and as victims they should be central to the care and assistance that is provided.